Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Gen Med ; 16: 1069-1079, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275251

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 creates a hypercoagulable state with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Of those, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is prevalent, and numerous studies have highlighted the importance of VTE prophylaxis. Pre-pandemic VTE prophylaxis practices have already been poor, despite guidelines. We hypothesized that the gap between guidelines and practices might have been closed due to increased awareness. Materials and Methods: Non-COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the internal medicine ward of a university hospital between January 1st, 2021, and June 30th, 2021, were assessed. VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis requirements were assessed using the Padua Prediction Score (PPS). The results were compared with the findings of the study conducted in the same setting before the pandemic. Results: A total of 267 patients were included, and 81 patients (30.3%) received prophylaxis. A total of 128 patients' (47.9%) PPS was ≥ 4, and 69 patients (53.9%) received prophylaxis; 12 low-risk patients (8.6%) received prophylaxis although it was not indicated. Compared to the pre-pandemic figures, both appropriate prophylaxis use and overuse rates have risen. While the increment rate of appropriate prophylaxis was statistically significant, the increment rate of overuse did not reach statistical significance. Patients hospitalized for infectious diseases and respiratory failure were more likely to receive appropriate prophylaxis. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a significant increase in appropriate pharmacologic prophylaxis rates among high-risk patients. Besides all the collateral damage the pandemic has created, it might also have brought collateral benefits with regards to VTE prophylaxis.

2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 4610, 2023 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283679

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the functional capacity of CD4+ and CD8+ terminally-differentiated effector (TEMRA), central memory (TCM), and effector memory (TEM) cells obtained from the volunteers vaccinated with an aluminum-adjuvanted inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac). The volunteers were followed for T cell immune responses following the termination of a randomized phase III clinical trial. Seven days and four months after the second dose of the vaccine, the memory T cell subsets were collected and stimulated by autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (mDCs) loaded with SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein S1. Compared to the placebo group, memory T cells from the vaccinated individuals significantly proliferated in response to S1-loaded mDCs. CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cell proliferation was detected in 86% and 78% of the vaccinated individuals, respectively. More than 73% (after a short-term) and 62% (after an intermediate-term) of the vaccinated individuals harbored TCM and/or TEM cells that responded to S1-loaded mDCs by secreting IFN-γ. The expression of CD25, CD38, 4-1BB, PD-1, and CD107a indicated a modulation in the memory T cell subsets. Especially on day 120, PD-1 was upregulated on CD4+ TEMRA and TCM, and on CD8+ TEM and TCM cells; accordingly, proliferation and IFN-γ secretion capacities tended to decline after 4 months. In conclusion, the combination of inactivated whole-virion particles with aluminum adjuvants possesses capacities to induce functional T cell responses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , Aluminum , SARS-CoV-2 , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Memory T Cells , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , COVID-19/prevention & control , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Vaccination , Virion
3.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 56(3): 553-565, 2022 Jul.
Article in Turkish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1988334

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has become a global cause of death/injury, particularly for those with limited access to vaccination programs and healthcare systems. The risk of re-infection is not negligible due to the emergence of new variants and the decrease in immunity of those who have recovered COVID-19 before. In this study, it was aimed to show longitudinally the change in antibody levels of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who had an antibody response in the early stages of their infection and to reveal a response pattern that would help to predict patients whose antibody responses decreased or persisted over time. This observational, single-center study included 38 non-critical patients admitted to COVID-19 wards. Anti-spike-1 IgG levels were investigated by the "enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)" method in two different samples taken at different times in each patient. Two distinct anti-spike-1 IgG antibody response patterns were detected in the study; the first pattern was that with low antibody production at first who had an increase in antibody levels after an average of six months, and the second pattern was that the initially high antibody levels decreased after an average of six months. This paradoxical kinetic may blur physicians' predictions of antibody response. In general, anti-spike-1 antibody levels showed a moderate decrease after six months, but production seems to continue (mean ∆IgG= -0.77; σ= 4; p= 0.24). Higher antibody levels were observed at the beginning in patients with concomitant bacterial pneumonia (mean initial IgG= 7.67; σ= 3.54) (p= 0.03). Although the production of S1-IgG in patients recovered from severe acute respiratory system coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2) was modestly reduced compared to the beginning measurements, the production in general persisted during the study period. It appears that IgG responses increase or remain constant in individuals with relatively low IgG index values when controlled after an average of 180 days, while IgG tends to decrease in individuals with high IgG index values.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
4.
Turk J Med Sci ; 52(1): 1-10, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1399425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the usefulness of such a reserved area for the admission of the patients' symptoms suggesting COVID-19 and compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with COVID-19 and without COVID-19 who were admitted to C1 during the first month of the COVID-19 outbreak in our hospital. METHODS: A new area was set up in Hacettepe University Adult Hospital to limit the contact of COVID-19 suspicious patients with other patients, which was named as COVID-19 First Evaluation Outpatient Clinic (C1). C1 had eight isolation rooms and two sampling rooms for SARS-CoV-2 polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR). All rooms were negative-pressurized. Patients who had symptoms that were compatible with COVID-19 were referred to C1 from pretriage areas. All staff received training for the appropriate use of personal protective equipment and were visited daily by the Infection Prevention and Control team. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight (29.4%) of 673 patients who were admitted to C1were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 20, 2020, and April 19, 2020. SARS-CoV-2 PCR was positive in 142 out of 673 patients. Chest computerized tomography (CT) was performed in 421 patients and COVID-19 was diagnosed in 56 of them based on CT findings despite negative PCR. Four hundred and ninety-three patients were tested for other viral and bacterial infections with multiplex real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RTPCR). Blood tests that included complete blood count, renal and liver functions, d-dimer levels, ferritin, C- reactive protein, and procalcitonin were performed in 593 patients. Only one out of 44 healthcare workers who worked at C1 was infected by SARS-CoV-2. DISCUSSION: Early diagnosis of infected patients and ensuring adequate isolation are very important to control the spread of COVID-19. The purpose of setting up the COVID-19 first evaluation outpatient clinic was to prevent the overcrowding of ER due to mild or moderate infections, ensure appropriate distancing and isolation, and enable emergency services to serve for real emergencies. A wellplanned outpatient care area and teamwork including internal medicine, microbiology, and radiology specialists under the supervision of infectious diseases specialists allowed adequate management of the mild-to-moderate patients with suspicion of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey/epidemiology , Hospitals, University , Ambulatory Care Facilities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL